Most binary matrices have no small defining set

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: Consider a matrix M chosen uniformly at random from a class of mimesn matrices of zeros and ones with prescribed row and column sums. A partially filled matrix D is a mathitdefining mathitset for M if M is the unique member of its class that contains the entries in D. The mathitsize of a defining set is the number of filled entries. A mathitcritical mathitset is a defining set for which the removal of any entry stops it being a defining set. For some small fixed epsilon>0, we assume that nlem=o(n1+epsilon), and that lambdale1/2, where lambda is the proportion of entries of M that equal 1. We also assume that the row sums of M do not vary by more than mathcalO(n1/2+epsilon), and that the column sums do not vary by more than mathcalO(m1/2+epsilon). Under these assumptions we show that M almost surely has no defining set of size less than lambdamn−mathcalO(m7/4+epsilon). It follows that M almost surely has no critical set of size more than (1−lambda)mn+mathcalO(m7/4+epsilon). Our results generalise a theorem of Cavenagh and Ramadurai, who examined the case when lambda=1/2 and n=m=2k for an integer k.












This page was built for publication: Most binary matrices have no small defining set

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q785838)