Most binary matrices have no small defining set
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Consider a matrix chosen uniformly at random from a class of matrices of zeros and ones with prescribed row and column sums. A partially filled matrix is a for if is the unique member of its class that contains the entries in . The of a defining set is the number of filled entries. A is a defining set for which the removal of any entry stops it being a defining set. For some small fixed , we assume that , and that , where is the proportion of entries of that equal . We also assume that the row sums of do not vary by more than , and that the column sums do not vary by more than . Under these assumptions we show that almost surely has no defining set of size less than . It follows that almost surely has no critical set of size more than . Our results generalise a theorem of Cavenagh and Ramadurai, who examined the case when and for an integer .
Recommendations
- Defining sets and critical sets in \((0,1)\)-matrices
- The maximum, supremum, and spectrum for critical set sizes in (0,1)-matrices
- Constructing (0,1)-matrices with large minimal defining sets
- Matrices with prescribed row and column sums
- On the number of matrices and a random matrix with prescribed row and column sums and 0-1 entries
Cites work
- Asymptotic enumeration of dense 0-1 matrices with specified line sums
- Asymptotic enumeration of sparse 0--1 matrices with irregular row and column sums
- Constructing (0,1)-matrices with large minimal defining sets
- Defining sets and critical sets in \((0,1)\)-matrices
- Probability and Computing
- The maximum, supremum, and spectrum for critical set sizes in (0,1)-matrices
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Most binary matrices have no small defining set
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q785838)