Multiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical Scenarios
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48091 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 409719 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1943779 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3276287 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3189754 (Why is no real title available?)
- Abandon Statistical Significance
- Analytic posteriors for Pearson's correlation coefficient
- Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? (With comments and a rejoinder).
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian?
Cited in
(6)- Analysis of type I and II error rates of Bayesian and frequentist parametric and nonparametric two-sample hypothesis tests under preliminary assessment of normality
- A battle in the statistics wars: a simulation-based comparison of Bayesian, frequentist and Williamsonian methodologies
- P-values don’t measure evidence
- Connecting simple and precise P‐values to complex and ambiguous realities (includes rejoinder to comments on “Divergence vs. decision P‐values”)
- Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way
- Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
This page was built for publication: Multiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical Scenarios
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5868275)
