On pluralistic methods for explaining argument acceptance in abstract argumentation

DOI10.1007/978-981-96-7956-0_15MaRDI QIDQ6877231zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Siyi Liu, Ziyi Gao, Beishui Liao, Chen Chen

Publication date 8 January 2026

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-7956-0_15

zbMATH Keywords

abstract argumentationexplainable artificial intelligenceexplaining argument acceptanceprinciple-and-property-based analysis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites work

• Abduction and dialogical proof in argumentation and logic programming
• Abduction in argumentation frameworks
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• Explainable logic-based argumentation
• Explaining non-acceptability in abstract argumentation
• Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences
• Explanation semantics for abstract argumentation
• Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation
• Necessary and sufficient explanations for argumentation-based conclusions
• On explanations for non-acceptable arguments
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• Strong explanations for nonmonotonic reasoning

This page was built for publication: On pluralistic methods for explaining argument acceptance in abstract argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6877231)