On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity.

DOI10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00057-3MaRDI QIDQ1420550zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors D. Massart, Ian J. Bateman, Matthew A. Cole, Philip Cooper, Stavros Georgiou, David Hadley, Gregory L. Poe

Publication date 2 February 2004

Published in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-0696(03)00057-3

zbMATH Keywords

Contingent valuationDesign effectsDirectionaleffectsScopeVisible choice sets

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Recommendations

• The scope trials: variation in sensitivity to scope and WTP with directionally bounded utility functions
• The case for diminishing marginal existence values
• Do contingent valuation estimates pass a ``scope test? A meta-analysis
• Effects of total cost and group-size information on willingness to pay responses: Open ended vs. dichotomous choice
• On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation. I: Caveat investigator

Cited in

(5)

• The case for diminishing marginal existence values
• Designing transactions without framing effects in iterative question formats.
• Economic preferences or attitude expressions?: An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. (With commentaries)
• Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness
• Design strategies for sequential choice experiments involving economic alternatives

This page was built for publication: On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1420550)