Projective versions of selection principles

Convergence in general topology (sequences, filters, limits, convergence spaces, nets, etc.) (54A20) Cardinality properties (cardinal functions and inequalities, discrete subsets) (54A25) Continuous maps (54C05) Function spaces in general topology (54C35) Noncompact covering properties (paracompact, Lindelöf, etc.) (54D20)

Review text

If \(\mathcal P\) is a class of topological spaces, then a space \(X\) is said to be projectively \(\mathcal P\) if \(f(X) \in \mathcal P\) for every continuous mapping \(f:X \to \mathbb R^{\omega}\). The authors of this nice paper study and characterize projective versions of classical covering properties of Menger, Hurewicz and Rothberger, and several other covering and closure-type properties defined in terms of selection principles. This investigation was initiated by the reviewer [Cubo Math. J. 8, No.~2, 23--31 (2006; Zbl 1116.54013)]. For example, it is shown that if all finite powers of \(X\) are projectively Menger (Rothberger), then all countable subspaces of the function space \(C_p(X)\) have countable (strong) fan tightness. Every space of cardinality \(< \mathfrak b\) is projectively Hurewicz. A space which is pseudocompact in all finite powers is projectively Rothberger if and only if it is projectively \(\gamma\). A number of examples is provided.

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(23)

This page was built for publication: Projective versions of selection principles

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2268842)