A comparative study of the reliability of nine statistical software packages

DOI10.1016/j.csda.2006.02.013zbMath1161.62302OpenAlexW2084150680WikidataQ122958573 ScholiaQ122958573MaRDI QIDQ1020020

Robert J. Pavur, Kellie B. Keeling

Publication date: 29 May 2009

Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.02.013

zbMATH Keywords

software testingnumerical accuracystatistical reference data sets (StRD)

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Related Items (8)

On the examination of the reliability of statistical software for estimating regression models with discrete dependent variables ⋮ The reliability of statistical functions in four software packages freely used in numerical computation ⋮ How accurate are the extremely small \(P\)-values used in genomic research: an evaluation of numerical libraries ⋮ Editorial: Special issue on statistical algorithms and software ⋮ On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2007 ⋮ The accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft\(^{\circledR}\) Excel 2007 ⋮ Section Editor's Notes ⋮ Statistical Accuracy of iPad Applications: An Initial Examination

Uses Software

• Mathematica
• LIMDEP
• Excel
• TestU01

Cites Work

• On the accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft Excel 2003
• On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2003
• Assessing the reliability of web-based statistical software
• On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2000 and Excel XP.
• Numerical Issues in Statistical Computing for the Social Scientist
• The accuracy of \textit{Mathematica 4} as a statistical package

This page was built for publication: A comparative study of the reliability of nine statistical software packages