A comparative study of the reliability of nine statistical software packages
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1020020
DOI10.1016/j.csda.2006.02.013zbMath1161.62302WikidataQ122958573 ScholiaQ122958573MaRDI QIDQ1020020
Kellie B. Keeling, Robert J. Pavur
Publication date: 29 May 2009
Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.02.013
62-04: Software, source code, etc. for problems pertaining to statistics
62J05: Linear regression; mixed models
62J02: General nonlinear regression
62J10: Analysis of variance and covariance (ANOVA)
62N05: Reliability and life testing
68N99: Theory of software
Related Items
How accurate are the extremely small \(P\)-values used in genomic research: an evaluation of numerical libraries, Editorial: Special issue on statistical algorithms and software, On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2007, The accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft\(^{\circledR}\) Excel 2007
Uses Software
Cites Work
- On the accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft Excel 2003
- On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2003
- Assessing the reliability of web-based statistical software
- On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2000 and Excel XP.
- Numerical Issues in Statistical Computing for the Social Scientist
- The accuracy of \textit{Mathematica 4} as a statistical package