On three arguments against categorical structuralism
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1036073
DOI10.1007/s11229-008-9346-2zbMath1195.03006OpenAlexW1992248344MaRDI QIDQ1036073
Publication date: 4 November 2009
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9346-2
collectionexistencecategory theoryset theoryfunctionoperationfoundation of mathematicsassertory theory
Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Categories of sets, characterizations (18B05) Foundations, relations to logic and deductive systems (18A15)
Related Items (2)
Towards a unified framework for decomposability of processes ⋮ Category-theoretic structure and radical ontic structural realism
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Structures and structuralism in contemporary philosophy of mathematics
- Categorical set theory: A characterization of the category of sets
- Logic as calculus and logic as language
- Structure in Mathematics
- Structure in Mathematics and Logic: A Categorical Perspective
- Exploring Categorical Structuralism
- An Answer to Hellman's Question: ‘Does Category Theory Provide a Framework for Mathematical Structuralism?’†
- Does Category Theory Provide a Framework for Mathematical Structuralism?†
- Numbers Can Be Just What They Have To
- Category Theory
- AN ELEMENTARY THEORY OF THE CATEGORY OF SETS
- Categories in Context: Historical, Foundational, and Philosophical
- Learning from Questions on Categorical Foundations
- Categories, Structures, and the Frege-Hilbert Controversy: The Status of Meta-mathematics
This page was built for publication: On three arguments against categorical structuralism