An Answer to Hellman's Question: ‘Does Category Theory Provide a Framework for Mathematical Structuralism?’†
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4470296
Recommendations
Cited in
(21)- Categories, Structures, and the Frege-Hilbert Controversy: The Status of Meta-mathematics
- Does Category Theory Provide a Framework for Mathematical Structuralism?†
- Towards a new epistemology of mathematics
- Structuralism and meta-mathematics
- How to be a structuralist all the way down
- Life on the Ship of Neurath: Mathematics in the Philosophy of Mathematics
- What is categorical structuralism?
- The scope of Gödel's first incompleteness theorem
- Learning from Questions on Categorical Foundations
- On three arguments against categorical structuralism
- Structuralism and category theory in the contemporary philosophy of mathematics
- Categories for the working mathematician: making the impossible possible
- Structuralism as a philosophy of mathematical practice
- NEITHER CATEGORICAL NOR SET-THEORETIC FOUNDATIONS
- An ``\(i\) for an \(i\): singular terms, uniqueness, and reference
- Transfinite recursion and computation in the iterative conception of set
- Indispensability and the problem of compatible explanations. A reply to `Should scientific realists be Platonists?'
- The mathematical description of a generic physical system
- Univalent foundations as structuralist foundations
- Categories without structures
- Comparing material and structural set theories
This page was built for publication: An Answer to Hellman's Question: ‘Does Category Theory Provide a Framework for Mathematical Structuralism?’†
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4470296)