Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game

DOI10.1007/s11238-009-9135-5zbMath1186.91104OpenAlexW3022939000MaRDI QIDQ1036111

Jean-François Laslier, Romina Boarini, Stephane Robin

Publication date: 4 November 2009

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.405.5901

zbMATH Keywords

fairnessultimatum gamebargaining experimentinterpersonal comparisons of utility

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26) Experimental studies (91A90)

Related Items (1)

Quantifying fairness to overcome selfishness: a behavioural model to describe the evolution and stabilization of inter-group bias using the ultimatum game

Cites Work

• Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis
• A theory of sequential reciprocity
• Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs
• A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
• Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
• Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game