Optimal redistricting under geographical constraints: why ``pack and crack does not work
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:1046263)
Optimal redistricting under geographical constraints: why ``pack and crack'' does not work
Optimal redistricting under geographical constraints: why ``pack and crack'' does not work
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(20)- Redistricting without gerrymandering, utilizing the convexity ratio, and other applications to business and industry
- Network-based dissolution
- A computational approach to unbiased districting
- Algorithms for gerrymandering over graphs
- Complexity of control by partitioning veto elections and of control by adding candidates to plurality elections
- A discrete districting plan
- On avoiding vote swapping
- Optimal partisan districting on planar geographies
- Control complexity in Borda elections: solving all open cases of offline control and some cases of online control
- Network-based vertex dissolution
- A graph partitioning model of congressional redistricting
- Reconfiguration of connected graph partitions
- The self-limiting partisan gerrymander: an optimization approach
- Padding and pruning: gerrymandering under turnout heterogeneity
- Fair redistricting is hard
- Redistricting algorithms
- Gerrymandering on graphs: computational complexity and parameterized algorithms
- On theoretical and empirical algorithmic analysis of the efficiency gap measure in partisan gerrymandering
- Optimality and fairness of partisan gerrymandering
- A fast sorting algorithm to redistricting election model
This page was built for publication: Optimal redistricting under geographical constraints: why ``pack and crack does not work
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1046263)