Anscombe's paradox and the rule of three-fourths

DOI10.1007/BF00125674MaRDI QIDQ1050892zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Carl G. Wagner

Publication date 1983

Published in Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00125674

zbMATH Keywords

Anscombe's paradoxmajority rule

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Cited in

(13)

• On constructing a generalized Ostrogorski paradox: Necessary and sufficient conditions
• Transitivity revisited
• Representation in majority tournaments
• Condorcet choice and the Ostrogorski paradox
• Connections and implications of the Ostrogorski paradox for spatial voting models
• Does choosing committees from approval balloting fulfill the electorate's will?
• The ostrogorski paradox and its relation to nontransitive choice
• Unanimity and the Anscombe's paradox
• The potential of iterative voting to solve the separability problem in referendum elections
• Majority rule or majority ruin: the delightful tale of G. E. M. Anscombe and why committee decision-making should come with a warning label
• Avoiding Anscombe's paradox
• Single-switch preferences and the Ostrogorski paradox
• The budget-voting paradox

This page was built for publication: Anscombe's paradox and the rule of three-fourths

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1050892)