Anscombe's paradox and the rule of three-fourths
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1050892
DOI10.1007/BF00125674zbMATH Open0513.90006OpenAlexW1964454326MaRDI QIDQ1050892FDOQ1050892
Authors: Carl G. Wagner
Publication date: 1983
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00125674
Cited In (12)
- Transitivity revisited
- Avoiding Anscombe's paradox
- Single-switch preferences and the Ostrogorski paradox
- The ostrogorski paradox and its relation to nontransitive choice
- Does Choosing Committees from Approval Balloting Fulfill the Electorate’s Will?
- On constructing a generalized Ostrogorski paradox: Necessary and sufficient conditions
- Connections and Implications of the Ostrogorski Paradox for Spatial Voting Models
- The potential of iterative voting to solve the separability problem in referendum elections
- Representation in majority tournaments
- The budget-voting paradox
- Condorcet choice and the Ostrogorski paradox
- Unanimity and the Anscombe's paradox
This page was built for publication: Anscombe's paradox and the rule of three-fourths
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1050892)