Does choosing committees from approval balloting fulfill the electorate's will?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2829680
DOI10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_7zbMATH Open1348.91105OpenAlexW120949863MaRDI QIDQ2829680FDOQ2829680
Authors: Lainé, Jean, Gilbert Laffond
Publication date: 8 November 2016
Published in: Studies in Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_7
Recommendations
Cites Work
- The paradox of multiple elections
- Sequential composition of voting rules in multi-issue domains
- The Condorcet criterion and committee selection
- Condorcet choice and the Ostrogorski paradox
- Sets of alternatives as Condorcet winners
- An Analysis of Simple Voting Systems for Electing Committees
- Partially monotonic bargaining solutions
- Anscombe's paradox and the rule of three-fourths
- Voting paradoxes and referenda
- Avoiding Anscombe's paradox
- Single-switch preferences and the Ostrogorski paradox
- On constructing a generalized Ostrogorski paradox: Necessary and sufficient conditions
- Ensuring Pareto optimality by referendum voting
- Some startling inconsistencies when electing committees
- How does separability affect the desirability of referendum election outcomes?
- A strong paradox of multiple elections
- Condorcet choice correspondences for weak tournaments
- The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable
- Consensus rules for committee elections
- Does majoritarian approval matter in selecting a social choice rule? an exploratory panel study
Cited In (3)
This page was built for publication: Does choosing committees from approval balloting fulfill the electorate's will?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2829680)