Some problems in testing the double cancellation condition in conjoint measurement
Two problems involved in testing the conjoint measurement condition of double cancellation are analysed. 1. It is argued that in the case of complete data matrices tests of double cancellation either confirm or falsify the hypothesis of additivity and that, contrary to popular belief, so-called ``no-tests are really acceptances. 2. It is shown that with a weak order upon \(3\times 3\) matrices both independence and a single test of double cancellation (which is logically independent of independence) are necessary and sufficient for additivity. Hence, if a weak order satisfies independence in such matrices only this single test of double cancellation needs to be performed.
- Cancellation conditions for finite two-dimensional additive measurement
- Unique finite conjoint measurement
- Theory and tests of the conjoint commutativity axiom for additive conjoint measurement
- Two factor additive conjoint measurement with one solvable component
- Enumerating and testing conjoint measurement models
- A note on the exact number of two- and three-way tables satisfying conjoint measurement and additivity axioms
- Two factor additive conjoint measurement with one solvable component
- Enumerating and testing conjoint measurement models
- Explaining robust additive utility models by sequences of preference swaps
- Evaluating the equal-interval hypothesis with test score scales
- A unified nonparametric IRT model for \(d\)-dimensional psychological test data (\(d\)-ISOP)
- About the some conditions of the replaceability of the double induction
- Bi-scalable and difference representations for triadic judgments
- Theory and tests of the conjoint commutativity axiom for additive conjoint measurement
- On Bayesian testing of additive conjoint measurement axioms using synthetic likelihood
- On Fishburn's questions about finite two-dimensional additive measurement
This page was built for publication: Some problems in testing the double cancellation condition in conjoint measurement
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1108727)