Three practical criteria of comparison among ordinal preference aggregating rules
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1127146
DOI10.1016/0377-2217(94)00012-2zbMATH Open0912.90007OpenAlexW2077626054MaRDI QIDQ1127146FDOQ1127146
Authors: S. H. Smith 
Publication date: 13 August 1998
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00012-2
Recommendations
- Theoretical elements of comparison among ordinal discrete multicriteria methods
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1149862
- Intensity of preference and related uncertainty in non-compensatory aggregation rules
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1302070
- A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data
Cites Work
- Social choice and individual values
- Priority Ranking and Consensus Formation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Condorcet Social Choice Functions
- A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Theoretical elements of comparison among ordinal discrete multicriteria methods
- Subset Choice Conditions and the Computation of Social Choice Sets
Cited In (5)
- Une typologie des méthodes multicritères: Proposition d'un cadre méthodologique
- Theoretical elements of comparison among ordinal discrete multicriteria methods
- Intensity of preference and related uncertainty in non-compensatory aggregation rules
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Towards a theory of MCDM: Stepping away from social choice theory
This page was built for publication: Three practical criteria of comparison among ordinal preference aggregating rules
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1127146)
