Strong versus weak quantum consequence operations
The question of consequence operations determined by (classes of) ortholattices is considered. The two logics go back to \textit{R. Goldblatt} [J. Philos. Log. 3, 19-35 (1974; Zbl 0278.02023)] and \textit{G. Kalmbach} [Z. Math. Log. Grundlagen Math. 20, 395-406 (1974; Zbl 0373.02030)] respectively; the attributes `strong' and `weak' are due to \textit{M. L. Dalla Chiara} [Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, 427-469 (1985; Zbl 0603.03001)]. Here it is proved that some of the properties usually considered as desirable for a logic, force any strong orthologic to be classical; this result has no full counterparts for weak logics. The necessary preliminaries are carefully explained in the first half of the paper.
- Algebraic aspects of deduction theorems
- An algebraic approach to non-classical logics
- Equivalential logics. I
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3889596 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1028822 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3807678 (Why is no real title available?)
- Matrix approach in methodology of sentential calculi
- Orthomodular Logic
- Quantum logics and Lindenbaum property
- Reduced products of logical matrices
- Semantic analysis of orthologic
- Semantics of the minimal logic of quantum mechanics
- The deduction theorem for quantum logic—some negative results
This page was built for publication: Strong versus weak quantum consequence operations
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1194110)