The independence postulate, hypothetical and called-off acts: A further reply to Rabinowicz

DOI10.1023/A:1005206710831zbMATH Open1016.91024OpenAlexW1533318965MaRDI QIDQ1587293FDOQ1587293

T. Seidenfeld

Publication date: 13 August 2003

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005206710831

zbMATH Keywords

admissibilitysequential decisionsindependence postulatecalled-off actshypothetical acts

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Individual preferences (91B08) Probability and inductive logic (03B48)

Cited In (3)

• Preference stability and substitution of indifferents: A rejoinder to Seidenfeld
• What are the minimal requirements of rational choice? Arguments from the sequential-decision setting
• The sure thing principle, dilations, and objective probabilities

   Recommendations

• Independence and the Havel-Hakimi residue 👍 👎
• ON EXISTENTIAL DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE IN IF LOGIC 👍 👎
• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• The Independent Choice Logic and Beyond 👍 👎
• POSSIBILITY THEORY III: POSSIBILISTIC INDEPENDENCE 👍 👎
• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• Independence concepts in possibility theory: II 👍 👎
• AN EPISTEMIC RATIONALE FOR ORDER INDEPENDENCE 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: The independence postulate, hypothetical and called-off acts: A further reply to Rabinowicz

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1587293)