The independence postulate, hypothetical and called-off acts: A further reply to Rabinowicz

DOI10.1023/A:1005206710831MaRDI QIDQ1587293zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors T. Seidenfeld

Publication date 13 August 2003

Published in Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005206710831

zbMATH Keywords

admissibilitysequential decisionsindependence postulatecalled-off actshypothetical acts

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Individual preferences (91B08) Probability and inductive logic (03B48)

Recommendations

• Independence and the Havel-Hakimi residue
• ON EXISTENTIAL DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE IN IF LOGIC
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3325540
• The Independent Choice Logic and Beyond
• POSSIBILITY THEORY III: POSSIBILISTIC INDEPENDENCE
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 851952
• Independence concepts in possibility theory: II
• AN EPISTEMIC RATIONALE FOR ORDER INDEPENDENCE

Cited in

(5)

• Preference stability and substitution of indifferents: A rejoinder to Seidenfeld
• What are the minimal requirements of rational choice? Arguments from the sequential-decision setting
• The sure thing principle, dilations, and objective probabilities
• Decision theory without ``independence or without ``ordering. What is the difference?
• Sequential decision processes under act-state independence with arbitrary choice functions

This page was built for publication: The independence postulate, hypothetical and called-off acts: A further reply to Rabinowicz

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1587293)