Dynamic contributions to a public project: the impact of rising marginal benefit and completion benefits
Summary: Many public projects are funded in a dynamic manner in which contributors are able to make gradual increases in contributions and condition additional contributions on the cooperation of others. This study presents results from experiments in which subjects with an initial fixed endowment make contributions to a public project gradually over a series of rounds. A \(2\times 2\) experimental design is used to examine the effectiveness of multiple thresholds that once crossed increase the marginal benefit of a contribution to the public project and the existence of a completion benefit upon project completion. Results reveal that when the multiple threshold design is combined with a completion benefit, overall contributions and project completion rates increase relative to other treatments. Without the presence of a completion benefit, contributions in the multiple threshold design are not significantly different from a constant marginal benefit design. In addition, completion benefits are shown to strongly encourage additional cooperation and project completion. Finally, projects are more likely to be completed when substantial contributions occur in the early rounds.
- Dynamic Voluntary Contribution to a Public Project
- Gradualism in Bargaining and Contribution Games
- Matching and challenge gifts to charity: evidence from laboratory and natural field experiments
- Sequential equilibrium in monotone games: A theory-based analysis of experimental data
- Step returns in threshold public goods: A meta- and experimental analysis
This page was built for publication: Dynamic contributions to a public project: the impact of rising marginal benefit and completion benefits
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1630451)