Two sources of poor coverage of confidence intervals after model selection
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1644205
DOI10.1016/J.SPL.2018.05.001zbMATH Open1392.62080arXiv1711.01739OpenAlexW2767261923WikidataQ129814996 ScholiaQ129814996MaRDI QIDQ1644205FDOQ1644205
Authors: Rheanna Mainzer, Paul Kabaila
Publication date: 21 June 2018
Published in: Statistics \& Probability Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: We compare the following two sources of poor coverage of post-model-selection confidence intervals: the preliminary data-based model selection sometimes chooses the wrong model and the data used to choose the model is re-used for the construction of the confidence interval.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.01739
Recommendations
- On various confidence intervals post-model-selection
- On the Large-Sample Minimal Coverage Probability of Confidence Intervals After Model Selection
- ON THE COVERAGE PROBABILITY OF CONFIDENCE INTERVALS IN REGRESSION AFTER VARIABLE SELECTION
- Upper bounds on the minimum coverage probability of confidence intervals in regression after model selection
- Valid confidence intervals for post-model-selection predictors
- Uniformly valid confidence intervals post-model-selection
- Rejoinder to Discussions on: Model confidence bounds for variable selection
Cites Work
- MODEL SELECTION AND INFERENCE: FACTS AND FICTION
- Model Selection: An Integral Part of Inference
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Estimation and accuracy after model selection
- Model-averaged Wald confidence intervals
- Upper bounds on the minimum coverage probability of confidence intervals in regression after model selection
- Frequentist Model Average Estimators
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Model-averaged profile likelihood intervals
- On the minimum coverage probability of model averaged tail area confidence intervals
- Model-averaged confidence intervals
- Further properties of frequentist confidence intervals in regression that utilize uncertain prior information
- The performance of model averaged tail area confidence intervals
Cited In (4)
- On various confidence intervals post-model-selection
- Upper bounds on the minimum coverage probability of confidence intervals in regression after model selection
- THE EFFECT OF A PRELIMINARY HAUSMAN TEST ON CONFIDENCE INTERVALS
- On the Large-Sample Minimal Coverage Probability of Confidence Intervals After Model Selection
This page was built for publication: Two sources of poor coverage of confidence intervals after model selection
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1644205)