Judicial torture as a screening device

DOI10.1515/BEJTE-2014-0023MaRDI QIDQ1675013zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Kong-Pin Chen, Tsung-Sheng Tsai

Publication date 26 October 2017

Published in The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bejte.2015.15.issue-2/bejte-2014-0023/bejte-2014-0023.xml?format=INT

zbMATH Keywords

evidencetorturetype I and type II errors

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of game theory (91A80) Economics of information (91B44)

Recommendations

• Torture and the Commitment Problem
• Evidence production in adversarial vs. inquisitorial regimes
• Contracting in the presence of judicial agency
• COSTLY EVIDENCE AND SYSTEMS OF FACT-FINDING
• IF WE CONFESS OUR SINS

Cites work

• A Bargaining Model with Incomplete Information About Time Preferences
• General axisymmetric solution of the creeping motion equations in the presence of free surfaces and gravitational forces
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4024918 (Why is no real title available?)
• Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence
• Reputation and imperfect information
• Symmetrical Tensor Fields of Constant Eigenvalue Ratio and Solutions of the Stress Equations for Creeping Motion
• The Effects of a Right to Silence

Cited in

(3)

• Torture and the Commitment Problem
• Legal Origins
• Evidence production in adversarial vs. inquisitorial regimes

This page was built for publication: Judicial torture as a screening device

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1675013)