Fairness and well-being measurement

DOI10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2016.11.003zbMath1415.91121OpenAlexW2557052183MaRDI QIDQ1680107

François Maniquet, Fleurbaey, Marc

Publication date: 22 November 2017

Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2016.11.003

zbMATH Keywords

fairnessmoney-metric utility functionsray utilitywell-being measures

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Utility theory (91B16) Social choice (91B14)

Related Items

Addendum to: ``Fairness and well-being measurement, Inequality‐averse well‐being measurement, How incentives matter? An illustration from the targeted subsidies reform in Iran, `Fair' welfare comparisons with heterogeneous tastes: subjective versus revealed preferences, Peter J. Hammond, Welfare egalitarianism in non-rival environments

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Pazner-Schmeidler rules in large societies
• Handbook of social choice and welfare. Vol. 2
• Fair social orderings
• The Pazner-Schmeidler social ordering: a defense
• Egalitarian-Equivalent Cost Sharing of a Public Good
• The Distance Function in Consumer Behaviour with Applications to Index Numbers and Optimal Taxation
• Universal Social Orderings: An Integrated Theory of Policy Evaluation, Inter-Society Comparisons, and Interpersonal Comparisons
• An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation