On the dispute between Boltzmann and Gibbs entropy

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1689644

DOI10.1016/J.AOP.2016.10.017zbMATH Open1378.82011arXiv1601.01509OpenAlexW3099208339MaRDI QIDQ1689644FDOQ1689644


Authors: Pierfrancesco Buonsante, Roberto Franzosi, Augusto Smerzi Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 17 January 2018

Published in: Annals of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Very recently, the validity of the concept of negative temperature has been challenged by several authors since they consider Boltzmann's entropy (that allows negative temperatures) inconsistent from a mathematical and statistical point of view, whereas they consider Gibbs' entropy (that does not admit negative temperatures) the correct definition for microcanonical entropy. In the present paper we prove that for systems with equivalence of the statistical ensembles Boltzmann entropy is the correct microcanonical entropy. Analytical results on two systems supporting negative temperatures, confirm the scenario we propose. In addition, we corroborate our proof by numeric simulations on an explicit lattice system showing that negative temperature equilibrium states are accessible and obey standard statistical mechanics prevision.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.01509




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (23)





This page was built for publication: On the dispute between Boltzmann and Gibbs entropy

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1689644)