The problem of coherence and truth redux
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1706740
DOI10.1007/S10670-015-9771-9zbMATH Open1384.03069OpenAlexW2172948966MaRDI QIDQ1706740FDOQ1706740
Authors: Michael Schippers 
Publication date: 28 March 2018
Published in: Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9771-9
Recommendations
Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Bayes Factors
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Measuring coherence
- Inductive Inconsistencies
- New hope for Shogenji's coherence measure
- Keynes's coefficient of dependence revisited
- Bayesian epistemology.
- Focused Correlation and Confirmation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A probabilistic theory of coherence
- Probabilistic measures of coherence: from adequacy constraints towards pluralism
- Problems with priors in probabilistic measures of coherence
- Against probabilistic measures of coherence
- Why there cannot be a single probabilistic measure of coherence
- Coherence as generalized logical equivalence
- Shogenji's probabilistic measure of coherence is incoherent
- The degree of epistemic justification and the conjunction fallacy
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Equivalent testimonies as a touchstone of coherence measures
- The impossibility of coherence
- Reliability conducive measures of coherence
- On the alleged impossibility of coherence
- Coherence reasoning and reliability: a defense of the Shogenji measure
- Is coherence conducive to reliability?
- POPPER'S QUALITATIVE THEORY OF VERISIMILITUDE
- Coherence, striking agreement, and reliability. On a putative vindication of the Shogenji measure
- ``For unto every one that hath shall be given. Matthew properties for incremental confirmation
- Believing more, risking less: On coherence, truth and non-trivial extensions
- ON POPPER'S DEFINITIONS OF VERISIMILITUDE1
- Coherence and truth conducive justification
- New Axioms for Probability and Likelihood Ratio Measures
- Towards a grammar of Bayesian coherentism
- Truthlikeness
- Verisimilitude and belief change for conjunctive theories
- Structural properties of qualitative and quantitative accounts to coherence
- Zwart and Franssen's impossibility theorem holds for possible-world-accounts but not for consequence-accounts to verisimilitude
- Verisimilitude and content
- A Verisimilar Ordering of Theories Phrased in a Propositional Language
Cited In (15)
- Coherence and the truth connection
- The possibility of coherentism and the stringency of \textit{ceteris paribus} conditions
- Focused Correlation and Confirmation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The impossibility of coherence
- On the alleged impossibility of coherence
- Reliability conducive measures of coherence
- The defeasible nature of coherentist justification
- Ways in which coherence is confirmation conducive
- Assessing theories: the coherentist approach
- On the truth-conduciveness of coherence
- Why does coherence appear truth-conducive?
- Why correspondence truth will not go away
- Coherence and probability. A study of probabilistic coherence models
- Genuine coherence as mutual confirmation between content elements
This page was built for publication: The problem of coherence and truth redux
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1706740)
