Assessing theories: the coherentist approach

DOI10.1007/S10670-013-9525-5zbMATH Open1304.03035OpenAlexW2050873027MaRDI QIDQ488361FDOQ488361

Peter Brössel

Publication date: 26 January 2015

Published in: Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16531/1/Theory%20Assessment%20%28final%29.pdf

File on IPFS (Hint: this is only the Hash - if you get a timeout, this file is not available on our server.)

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory
• Measuring coherence
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Inductive Inconsistencies
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Probabilities over rich languages, testing and randomness
• A probabilistic theory of coherence
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Assessing theories, Bayes style
• The degree of epistemic justification and the conjunction fallacy
• Coherence measures and inference to the best explanation
• POPPER'S QUALITATIVE THEORY OF VERISIMILITUDE
• Confirmation and justification. A commentary on Shogenji's measure
• ON POPPER'S DEFINITIONS OF VERISIMILITUDE¹
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (5)

• INCOHERENCE AND INCONSISTENCY
• The logic of theory assessment
• Keynes's coefficient of dependence revisited
• Evaluating competing theories via a common language of qualitative verdicts
• On the role of explanatory and systematic power in scientific reasoning

   Recommendations

• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• Assessing theories, Bayes style 👍 👎
• Against probabilistic measures of coherence 👍 👎
• The problem of coherence and truth redux 👍 👎
• Plausibilistic coherence 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: Assessing theories: the coherentist approach

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q488361)