The logic of theory assessment
DOI10.1007/S10992-006-9044-9zbMATH Open1126.03030OpenAlexW2123325708MaRDI QIDQ2454872FDOQ2454872
Authors: Franz Huber 
Publication date: 22 October 2007
Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-83263
Recommendations
adequacyprobability measuresphilosophy of scienceranking functionsconfirmationpositive relevancenonmonotonic consequence relationsconfirmatory consequence relationsinformative theoriesplausible theories
Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)
Cites Work
- Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
- The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- I.—STUDIES IN THE LOGIC OF CONFIRMATION (I.)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Ranking functions and rankings on languages
- Metaconfirmation
- Is there a logic of confirmation transfer?
Cited In (8)
- Why are good theories good? Reflections on epistemic values, confirmation, and formal epistemology
- Three ways of being non-material
- The logic of coherence
- Assessing theories, Bayes style
- Completeness for counter-doxa conditionals -- using ranking semantics
- Is there a logic of confirmation transfer?
- Evaluating competing theories via a common language of qualitative verdicts
- Hempel, Grue and the logical empiricist baseline
This page was built for publication: The logic of theory assessment
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2454872)
