Can there be a Bayesian explanationism? On the prospects of a productive partnership
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1708783
DOI10.1007/s11229-015-0990-zzbMath1417.03112OpenAlexW2285722471MaRDI QIDQ1708783
Publication date: 27 March 2018
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/13438/7/Can%20There%20Be%20A%20Bayesian%20Explanationism%20On%20the%20Prospects%20of%20a%20Productive%20Partnership.pdf
Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05) Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)
Related Items (2)
On the pragmatic and epistemic virtues of inference to the best explanation ⋮ String theory, non-empirical theory assessment, and the context of pursuit
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- What is mathematical truth?
- Peirce-suit of truth -- why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused
- Inference to the best explanation, coherence and other explanatory virtues
- Explanatoriness is evidentially irrelevant, or inference to the best explanation meets Bayesian confirmation theory
- Bayesianism and Inference to the Best Explanation
- Probability and the Explanatory Virtues
- A Bayesian Account of the Virtue of Unification
- COIStories: Explanation and Evidence in the History of Science
- How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or LessAd HocTheories will Provide More Accurate Predictions
- In Defence of Objective Bayesianism
- Explanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic
This page was built for publication: Can there be a Bayesian explanationism? On the prospects of a productive partnership