How does resolution of strategy affect network reciprocity in spatial prisoner's dilemma games?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1735237
Recommendations
- Combination of continuous and binary strategies enhances network reciprocity in a spatial prisoner's dilemma game
- Assortative and dissortative priorities for game interaction and strategy adaptation significantly bolster network reciprocity in the prisoner's dilemma
- \(q\)-strategy spatial prisoner's dilemma game
- Effect of a large gaming neighborhood and a strategy adaptation neighborhood for bolstering network reciprocity in a prisoner's dilemma game
- Coevolution of discrete, mixed, and continuous strategy systems boosts in the spatial prisoner's dilemma and chicken games
Cites work
- Correlated asynchronous behavior updating with a mixed strategy system in spatial prisoner's dilemma games enhances cooperation
- Evolutionary dynamics. Exploring the equations of life.
- Fundamentals of evolutionary game theory and its applications
- Mathematical analysis of environmental system. Transl. from the Japanese
- Spatial reciprocity for discrete, continuous and mixed strategy setups
Cited in
(5)- Effects of interconnections among corruption, institutional punishment, and economic factors on the evolution of cooperation
- Spatial reciprocity for discrete, continuous and mixed strategy setups
- Coevolution of multi-game resolves social dilemma in network population
- Ranking game on networks: the evolution of hierarchical society
- Combination of continuous and binary strategies enhances network reciprocity in a spatial prisoner's dilemma game
This page was built for publication: How does resolution of strategy affect network reciprocity in spatial prisoner's dilemma games?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1735237)
