The ``corollarium II to the proposition XXIII of Saccheri's \textit{Euclides}
Es ist nicht immer einfach, an die 2300 Jahre alten für unsere Begriffe manchmal grob formulierten verbalen Aussagen der ``Elemente Euklids den Maßstab des 18. Jh. oder gar von heute anzulegen; folglich erhebt sich z.B. einmal die Frage, ``quoties sub basi finita infinitilaterum esset triangulum. Im vorliegenden Beitrag handelt es sich darum, daß Hieronymus Saccherius in seinem ``Euclides von 1733 -- ``in spite of how strange to us such an interpretation may be, it is the correct interpretation of this quoted text (S. 537) -- das Parallelenpostulat zu beweisen trachtete, während die Ebene der ``Elemente doch ``obviously has no point at infinity (S. 537).
- Logical and historical remarks on Saccheri's geometry
- Euclid vindicated from every blemish. Edited and annotated by Vincenzo De Risi. Translated from the Italian by G. B. Halsted and L. Allegri
- Il quinto postulato Euclideo da C. Clavio (1589) a G. Saccheri (1733)
- The hypothesis of obtuse angle in Saccheri
- A note on lines and planes in Euclid's geometry
- Il quinto postulato Euclideo da C. Clavio (1589) a G. Saccheri (1733)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 426178 (Why is no real title available?)
- Remarks on Euclid’s Elements I,32 and the Parallel Postulate
- The hypothesis of obtuse angle in Saccheri
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3064067 (Why is no real title available?)
This page was built for publication: The ``corollarium II to the proposition XXIII of Saccheri's \textit{Euclides}
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1802373)
