Newton's argument for Proposition 1 of the \textit{Principia}
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1809896
Recommendations
- Kepler's area law in the \textit{Principia}: filling in some details in Newton's proof of Proposition 1.
- On newton's proof that inverse-square orbits must be conics
- Newton's \textit{Principia} and inverse-square orbits: The flaw reexamined
- Dismantling a centuries-old myth: Newton’s P r i n c i p i
- The importance of being equivalent: Newton's two models of one-body motion
Cited in
(13)- Polygons and Parabolas: Some Problems Concerning the Dynamics of Planetary Orbits*
- Newton's interpretation of Newton's second law
- Force, deflection, and time: Proposition VI of Newton's \textit{Principia}
- The importance of being equivalent: Newton's two models of one-body motion
- Newton's Polygon Model and the Second Order Fallacy
- The mathematical form of measurement and the argument for Proposition I in Newton's \textit{Principia}
- Passage to the limit in Proposition I, Book I of Newton's \textit{Principia}.
- The argument(s) for universal gravitation
- Proposition II (Book I) of Newton's \(Principia\)
- Kepler's area law in the \textit{Principia}: filling in some details in Newton's proof of Proposition 1.
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 139968 (Why is no real title available?)
- Newton's mature dynamics and the Principia: A simplified solution to the Kepler problem
- Mathematical models in Newton'sPrincipia: A new view of the ‘Newtonian Style’
This page was built for publication: Newton's argument for Proposition 1 of the \textit{Principia}
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1809896)