scientific article; zbMATH DE number 139968
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4028319
zbMATH Open0762.94014MaRDI QIDQ4028319FDOQ4028319
Authors: Michael Mendler, Terry Stroup
Publication date: 28 March 1993
Title of this publication is not available (Why is that?)
Recommendations
- Newtonian arbiters cannot be proven correct
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4035758
- Theories of Newtonian gravity and empirical indistinguishability
- Newton's experimental proofs as eliminative reasoning
- The validity of Newton's lemma 28
- In Defense of Newton: A Physicist's View
- Proving Cleanthes wrong
- Galileo and the equivalence principle: a faulty argument with the correct conclusion
- Newton's argument for Proposition 1 of the \textit{Principia}
synchronizationclosureresetdominancelivenesscircuit designfault testingcontinuous automatainput-output behavior of an arbiter
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication:
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4028319)