Should knowledge entail belief?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1815407
DOI10.1007/BF00257382zbMATH Open0866.03015OpenAlexW2068303037MaRDI QIDQ1815407FDOQ1815407
Publication date: 11 December 1996
Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00257382
Recommendations
logic of knowledge and beliefentailment propertyKD45S5-interpretation of knowledgesemantics for knowledge and belief
Other nonclassical logic (03B60) Knowledge representation (68T30) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cited In (17)
- The modal logic of agreement and noncontingency
- Knowledge Means ‘All’, Belief Means ‘Most’
- A note on closure spaces determined by intersections
- How do Beliefs Simplify Reasoning?
- Schematic Validity in Dynamic Epistemic Logic: Decidability
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Are there degrees of belief?
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The many faces of closure and introspection. An ineractive perspective
- Intricate axioms as interaction axioms
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Knowledge means ‘all’, belief means ‘most’
- Distributed knowability and Fitch's paradox
- Inverse images of box formulas in modal logic
- The revival of rejective negation
- Information dynamics and uniform substitution
- Some remarks on the model theory of epistemic plausibility models
This page was built for publication: Should knowledge entail belief?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1815407)