The partitioning principle: a powerful tool in multiple decision theory
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1848971
DOI10.1214/AOS/1031689023zbMATH Open1029.62064OpenAlexW2068393255MaRDI QIDQ1848971FDOQ1848971
Authors: Helmut Finner, Klaus Straßburger 
Publication date: 14 November 2002
Published in: The Annals of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1031689023
Recommendations
- Partitioning principle and selection of good treatments
- Partitioning for confidence sets, confident directions, and decision paths
- On δ-Equivalence With the Best in k-Sample Models
- The sequential rejection principle of familywise error control
- Applying the generalized partitioning principle to control the generalized familywise error rate
multiple comparisonsdirectional errorsmultiple levelsformal closure principlestrong and weak multiple partitioning principles
Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Statistical ranking and selection procedures (62F07) Statistical decision theory (62C99) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)
Cites Work
- On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance
- Simultaneous Test Procedures--Some Theory of Multiple Comparisons
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Multiple Comparisons
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A Theory of some Multiple Decision Problems, I
- A Theory of Some Multiple Decision Problems. II
- THE DISTRIBUTION OF RANGE IN SAMPLES FROM A NORMAL POPULATION, EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF AN INDEPENDENT ESTIMATE OF STANDARD DEVIATION
- Some selection rules for comparing p processes with a standard
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Control of directional errors with stagewise multiple test procedures
- Stepwise multiple test procedures and control of directional errors
- Combining the advantages of one-sided and two-sided procedures for comparing several treatments with a control
- Two-sided tests and one-sided confidence bounds
- On the Relationship Between Stepwise Decision Procedures and Confidence Sets
- D-optimality of complete latin squares
- Some recent developments in analysis of variance
- Least favorable parameter configurations for a step-down subset selection procedure
- Closed subset selection procedures for selecting good populations
- Stepwise multiple comparisons with the best
- Duality between multiple testing and selecting
- Some subset selection problems
- Combining the Advantages of One-Sided and Two-Sided Test Procedures for Comparing Several Treatment Effects
Cited In (43)
- Testing is confidence estimation: partition multiple testing
- Testing for efficacy in primary and secondary endpoints by partitioning decision paths
- A new user specific multiple testing method for business applications: the SiMaFlex procedure
- Basic ideas and concepts for multiple comparison procedures
- Rank verification for exponential families
- Nonparametric testing for multiple survival functions with noninferiority margins
- On hypothesis testing with a partitioned random alternative
- Rejoinder
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Hypothesis testing for arbitrary bounds
- Testing for order among K populations: theory and examples
- Using the partitioning principle to construct confidence sets for the location of a disease gene
- Identification of minimum effective dose based on ratio of a normally distributed data under heteroscedasticity
- Making Decisions in Multi Partitioning
- On stepwise control of the generalized familywise error rate
- Decision theory results for one-sided multiple comparison procedures
- Partition testing in confirmatory adaptive designs with structured objectives
- Ordered Multiple Comparisons with the Best and Their Applications to Dose–Response Studies
- A Bayesian decision-theoretic approach to logically-consistent hypothesis testing
- A stepwise procedure for toxicity studies based on ratio of two means
- Biostatistical assessment of mutagenicity studies: a stepwise confidence procedure
- A new approach to address multiplicity in hypothesis testing with constraints
- Discussion on “Adaptive enrichment designs with a continuous biomarker” by Nigel Stallard
- Interpreting tests of a hypothesis at multiple alpha levels within a Neyman-Pearson framework
- On δ-Equivalence With the Best in k-Sample Models
- Empirical likelihood based tests for stochastic ordering under right censorship
- The sequential rejection principle of familywise error control
- Closure properties of classes of multiple testing procedures
- Familywise and per-family error rates of multiple comparison procedures
- Tests for Jumps in Yield Spreads
- Only closed testing procedures are admissible for controlling false discovery proportions
- Inference for the Dimension of a Regression Relationship Using Pseudo-Covariates
- Simultaneous confidence intervals for ranks using the partitioning principle
- Uniformly most powerful tests for simultaneously detecting a treatment effect in the overall population and at least one subpopulation
- An improved closed procedure for testing multiple hypotheses
- Simultaneous confidence regions for closed tests, including Holm-, Hochberg-, and Hommel-related procedures
- Some aspects of response variable selection and estimation in multivariate linear regression
- Partitioning principle and selection of good treatments
- Shelf-life and its estimation in drug stability studies
- General solutions to consistency problems in multiple hypothesis testing
- Logical and test consistency in pairwise multiple comparisons
- Tree based diagnostic procedures following a smooth test of goodness-of-fit
- Multiple Comparisons with the Best Control in a One-Way Layout
This page was built for publication: The partitioning principle: a powerful tool in multiple decision theory
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1848971)
