Is set modeling of white noise a good tool for robust H₂ analysis?
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- A set-based approach for white noise modeling
- Convex methods for robust H/sub 2/ analysis of continuous-time systems
- Analysis of \(\mathcal H_2\) performance robustness with respect to disturbance model uncertainty
- Analysis of Robust H2 Performance Using Multiplier Theory
- A convex approach to robust \({\mathcal H}_{2}\) performance analysis
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 53439 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3281211 (Why is no real title available?)
- A set-based approach for white noise modeling
- An exact solution to general SISO mixed ℋ/sub 2//ℋ/sub ∞/ problems via convex optimization
- Analysis of Robust H2 Performance Using Multiplier Theory
- Frequency domain conditions for robust H/sub 2/ performance
- LQG control with an H/sup infinity / performance bound: a Riccati equation approach
- Loop transfer recovery for nonminimum phase plants
- Mixed \({\mathcal H}_ 2/{\mathcal H}_{\infty}\) control for discrete-time systems via convex optimization
- Mixed ℋ/sub 2/ and ℋ/sub ∞/ performance objectives. I. Robust performance analysis
- Mixed ℋ/sub 2/ and ℋ/sub ∞/ performance objectives. II. Optimal control
- Multiobjective H/sub 2//H/sub ∞/ control
- The LQG/LTR procedure for multivariable feedback control design
- The robust H/sub 2/ control problem: a worst-case design
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: Is set modeling of white noise a good tool for robust \({\mathcal H}_2\) analysis?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1962007)