The difficulty of constructing a leaf-labelled tree including or avoiding given subtrees
It is known that the following question is NP-complete: Given a set of trees with leaves labelled from the set \(L\), does there exist a tree \(T\) with leaves labelled by \(L\) such that each of the given trees is homeomorphic to a subtree of \(T\)? If all trees have one label in common the question is solvable in polynomial time. The authors prove, however, that the problem is NP-complete even if it is known that each given tree contains \(x\) or \(y\), where \(x\) and \(y\) are two given labels. Some related complexity results are proved, too.
- An efficient algorithm for supertrees
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 871930 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inferring a Tree from Lowest Common Ancestors with an Application to the Optimization of Relational Expressions
- Reconstruction of rooted trees from subtrees
- The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees
- Determining the consistency of partial tree descriptions
- Convex tree realizations of partitions
- The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees
- The reducts of the homogeneous binary branching C-relation
- Solving infinite-domain CSPs using the patchwork property
- Recognising the overlap graphs of subtrees of restricted trees is hard
This page was built for publication: The difficulty of constructing a leaf-labelled tree including or avoiding given subtrees
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1962070)