Luce arbitrates: stochastic resolution of inner conflicts

DOI10.1016/J.GEB.2020.11.009zbMATH Open1458.91062OpenAlexW3113280105MaRDI QIDQ1995470FDOQ1995470

Pedram Heydari

Publication date: 23 February 2021

Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2020.11.009

zbMATH Keywords

game theorystochastic choicereference dependencecontext dependenceattraction effectLuce rulecompromise effectconflicting motivesmulti-attribute decisions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Applications of game theory (91A80) Stochastic processes (60G99)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model
• Multinomial Logit Specification Tests
• Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data
• Quantal response equilibria for normal form games
• Lattice Theory: Foundation
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
• Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences
• Choice by elimination
• Stochastic Choice and Consideration Sets
• Random Choice as Behavioral Optimization
• The effects of decoy gambles on individual choice
• Does repetition improve consistency?
• Stochastic Choice and Revealed Perturbed Utility
• Menu-Dependent Stochastic Feasibility
• Reason-based choice: A bargaining rationale for the attraction and compromise effects
• Choosing monetary sequences: theory and experimental evidence
• Understanding the reference effect
• On path independent stochastic choice

Cited In (2)

• Random utility models with status quo bias
• A characterization of the Luce choice rule for an arbitrary collection of menus

This page was built for publication: Luce arbitrates: stochastic resolution of inner conflicts

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1995470)