Luce arbitrates: stochastic resolution of inner conflicts

DOI10.1016/j.geb.2020.11.009zbMath1458.91062OpenAlexW3113280105MaRDI QIDQ1995470

Pedram Heydari

Publication date: 23 February 2021

Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2020.11.009

zbMATH Keywords

game theoryreference dependenceattraction effectstochastic choicecontext dependenceLuce rulecompromise effectconflicting motivesmulti-attribute decisions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Applications of game theory (91A80) Stochastic processes (60G99)

Related Items (1)

Random utility models with status quo bias

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Choosing monetary sequences: theory and experimental evidence
• Quantal response equilibria for normal form games
• The effects of decoy gambles on individual choice
• Understanding the reference effect
• Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences
• Choice by elimination
• Reason-based choice: A bargaining rationale for the attraction and compromise effects
• Lattice Theory: Foundation
• Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model
• Multinomial Logit Specification Tests
• Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
• Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data
• Menu-Dependent Stochastic Feasibility
• Stochastic Choice and Revealed Perturbed Utility
• Stochastic Choice and Consideration Sets
• Random Choice as Behavioral Optimization
• On path independent stochastic choice
• Does repetition improve consistency?

This page was built for publication: Luce arbitrates: stochastic resolution of inner conflicts