A counterexample to montgomery's conjecture on dynamic colourings of regular graphs

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2012068

DOI10.1016/J.DAM.2017.05.004zbMATH Open1367.05068arXiv1702.00973OpenAlexW2602246102WikidataQ123238184 ScholiaQ123238184MaRDI QIDQ2012068FDOQ2012068


Authors: Nathan Bowler, Joshua Erde, Florian Lehner, Martin Merker, Max F. Pitz, Konstantinos S. Stavropoulos Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 July 2017

Published in: Discrete Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A emph{dynamic colouring} of a graph is a proper colouring in which no neighbourhood of a non-leaf vertex is monochromatic. The emph{dynamic colouring number} chi2(G) of a graph G is the least number of colours needed for a dynamic colouring of G. Montgomery conjectured that chi2(G)leqchi(G)+2 for all regular graphs G, which would significantly improve the best current upper bound chi2(G)leq2chi(G). In this note, however, we show that this last upper bound is sharp by constructing, for every integer ngeq2, a regular graph G with chi(G)=n but chi2(G)=2n. In particular, this disproves Montgomery's conjecture.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00973




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (10)





This page was built for publication: A counterexample to montgomery's conjecture on dynamic colourings of regular graphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2012068)