Entitlement and the efficiency-equality trade-off: an experimental study

DOI10.1007/S11238-013-9364-5zbMATH Open1290.91036OpenAlexW2028842431MaRDI QIDQ2015035FDOQ2015035

Authors Agnes Bäker, Kerstin Pull, Manfred Stadler, Werner Güth

Publication date 18 June 2014

Published in Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/172911/9/Entitlement_Theory_and_Decision.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

efficiencyequalitysatisficingentitlement

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

2-person games (91A05) Experimental studies (91A90)

Recommendations

• Equity versus efficiency? Evidence from three-person generosity experiments
• An experimental study of the generosity game
• Merit norms in the ultimatum game: an experimental study of the effect of merit on individual behavior and aggregate outcomes
• Distributional concerns: Equity- or efficiency-oriented?
• What makes an allocation fair? Some experimental evidence.

Cites work

• An experimental study of the generosity game
• Equity versus efficiency? Evidence from three-person generosity experiments
• Equity, efficiency and evolutionary stability in bargaining games with joint production
• More is better, but fair is fair: Tipping in dictator and ultimatum games
• The Becker-deGroot-Marschak mechanism is not necessarily incentive compatible, even for non-random goods

Cited in

(3)

• Equity versus efficiency? Evidence from three-person generosity experiments
• Rawlsian altruism with perfect discrimination leads to social efficiency
• Merit norms in the ultimatum game: an experimental study of the effect of merit on individual behavior and aggregate outcomes

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• Z-Tree

This page was built for publication: Entitlement and the efficiency-equality trade-off: an experimental study

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2015035)