What should I believe about what would have been the case?
DOI10.1007/S10992-014-9314-XzbMATH Open1318.03012OpenAlexW2095033023MaRDI QIDQ2018589FDOQ2018589
Authors: Franz Huber 
Publication date: 24 March 2015
Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10836/1/JPL.pdf
File on IPFS (Hint: this is only the Hash - if you get a timeout, this file is not available on our server.)
Recommendations
Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05)
Cites Work
- Causation, prediction, and search
- Causality. Models, reasoning, and inference
- On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
- Propositional reasoning that tracks probabilistic reasoning
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On a new axiomatic theory of probability
- On the logic of iterated belief revision
- A peculiarity in Pearl's logic of interventionist counterfactuals
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs
- The measurement of ranks and the laws of iterated contraction
- Reducing belief simpliciter to degrees of belief
- Actual causation and the art of modeling
- Declarations of independence
- A probabilistic semantics for counterfactuals. Part A
- The consistency argument for ranking functions
- A PROBABILISTIC SEMANTICS FOR COUNTERFACTUALS. PART B
- Relative Frequencies
- New foundations for counterfactuals
- Structural equations and beyond
- Chance and Necessity
- From causal models to counterfactual structures
Cited In (5)
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: What should I believe about what would have been the case?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2018589)
