What should I believe about what would have been the case?

DOI10.1007/S10992-014-9314-XMaRDI QIDQ2018589zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Franz Huber

Publication date 24 March 2015

Published in Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10836/1/JPL.pdf

IPFS File on IPFS (Hint: this is only the Hash - if you get a timeout, this file is not available on our server.)

zbMATH Keywords

counterfactualschanceprobability measurescredenceranking functionsconfirmationconditional belief

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05)

Recommendations

• Should I believe all the truths?
• Knowing how things might have been
• What should have happened if Hardy had discovered this?
• What might be the case after a change in view

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1014107 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3298815 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3323559 (Why is no real title available?)
• A PROBABILISTIC SEMANTICS FOR COUNTERFACTUALS. PART B
• A peculiarity in Pearl's logic of interventionist counterfactuals
• A probabilistic semantics for counterfactuals. Part A
• Actual causation and the art of modeling
• Causality. Models, reasoning, and inference
• Causation, prediction, and search
• Chance and Necessity
• Declarations of independence
• From causal models to counterfactual structures
• Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs
• New foundations for counterfactuals
• On a new axiomatic theory of probability
• On the logic of iterated belief revision
• On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
• Propositional reasoning that tracks probabilistic reasoning
• Reducing belief simpliciter to degrees of belief
• Relative Frequencies
• Structural equations and beyond
• The consistency argument for ranking functions
• The measurement of ranks and the laws of iterated contraction

Cited in

(5)

• New foundations for counterfactuals
• Out of the closet
• Counterfactuals and probability
• Completeness for counter-doxa conditionals -- using ranking semantics
• Why follow the royal rule?

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• TETRAD

This page was built for publication: What should I believe about what would have been the case?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2018589)