Instanton bundles vs Ulrich bundles on projective spaces
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2028010
DOI10.1007/S13366-020-00506-7zbMATH Open1469.14091OpenAlexW3035872352MaRDI QIDQ2028010FDOQ2028010
Authors: Laura Costa, Rosa M. Miró-Roig 
Publication date: 31 May 2021
Published in: Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13366-020-00506-7
Recommendations
Vector bundles on surfaces and higher-dimensional varieties, and their moduli (14J60) Sheaves in algebraic geometry (14F06)
Cites Work
- Instantons and algebraic geometry
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Resultants and Chow forms via exterior syzygies
- Determinantal hypersurfaces.
- Vector bundles on complex projective spaces
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Some comments on the ADHM construction in 4k dimensions
- Gorenstein rings and modules with high numbers of generators
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Yang-Mills fields on quaternionic spaces
- Cohomology of a general instanton bundle
- An introduction to Ulrich bundles
- Ulrich bundles. From commutative algebra to algebraic geometry
- Ulrich Bundles on Veronese Surfaces
Cited In (6)
- Instanton sheaves on projective schemes
- \(H\)-instanton bundles on three-dimensional polarized projective varieties
- Torsion free instanton sheaves on the blow-up of \(\mathbb{P}^n\) at a point
- Tangent, cotangent, normal and conormal bundles are almost never instanton bundles
- A sample of problems where Ulrich bundles show up
- Stable Ulrich bundles on Fano threefolds with Picard number 2
This page was built for publication: Instanton bundles vs Ulrich bundles on projective spaces
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2028010)
