Preservation of normality by non-oblivious group selection
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2035474
Abstract: We give two different proofs of the fact that non-oblivious selection via regular group sets preserves normality. Non-oblivious here means that whether or not a symbol is selected can depend on the symbol itself. One proof relies on the incompressibility of normal sequences, the other on the use of augmented dynamical systems.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 941396 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2206109 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3383900 (Why is no real title available?)
- Continued fraction normality is not preserved along arithmetic progressions
- Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in diophantine approximation
- Endliche Automaten und Zufallsfolgen
- Finite-state dimension
- Non-trivial matrix actions preserve normality for continued fractions
- Normal numbers and computer science
- Normal numbers and finite automata
- Normal numbers and selection rules
- Normality and automata
- Normality and two-way automata
- On the Piatetskii-Shapiro criterion of normality
- Selection functions that do not preserve normality
- Subsequences of normal sequences
- Uncanny subsequence selections that generate normal numbers
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Preservation of normality by non-oblivious group selection
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2035474)