Can we resolve the continuum hypothesis?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2054119
DOI10.1007/S11229-017-1648-9zbMATH Open1475.03034OpenAlexW2771436571MaRDI QIDQ2054119FDOQ2054119
Authors: Shivaram Lingamneni 
Publication date: 1 December 2021
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1648-9
Recommendations
Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Continuum hypothesis and Martin's axiom (03E50)
Cites Work
- Suitable extender models. II: Beyond \(\omega \)-huge
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Large cardinals from determinacy
- All automorphisms of the Calkin algebra are inner
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Structuralism, Invariance, and Univalence
- On Khot’s unique games conjecture
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A simple maximality principle
- The hyperuniverse program
- The set-theoretic multiverse
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On reflection principles
- What does it take to prove Fermat's last theorem? Grothendieck and the logic of number theory
- Countable tightness and proper forcing
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Does mathematics need new axioms?
- Indefiniteness in semi-intuitionistic set theories: on a conjecture of Feferman
- Forcing isomorphism
- Gödel's program
- The continuum hypothesis, the generic-multiverse of sets, and the \(\Omega\) conjecture
- Multiversism and concepts of set: how much relativism is acceptable?
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Restrictiveness relative to notions of interpretation
- Defending the axioms. On the philosophical foundations of set theory
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Can we resolve the continuum hypothesis?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2054119)
