Credence for conclusions: a brief for Jeffrey's rule

DOI10.1007/s11229-018-1782-zzbMath1475.62081OpenAlexW2800036934WikidataQ129833428 ScholiaQ129833428MaRDI QIDQ2055907

John R. Welch

Publication date: 1 December 2021

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1782-z

zbMATH Keywords

probabilityBayes' theoremplausibilitypragma-dialecticsJeffrey's ruleargumentation schemesargument evaluationinformal logicdeductive soundness

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05)

Cites Work

• A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation
• Great expectations. II: Generalized expected utility as a universal decision rule
• A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies
• Revising incomplete attitudes
• Fuzzy sets and systems. Theory and applications
• The logic of conditionals. An application of probability to deductive logic
• Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility
• Towards a unified theory of imprecise probability
• Vague credence
• A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency
• Framing human inference by coherence based probability logic
• Evaluating practical reasoning
• Great expectations. I: On the customizability of generalized expected utility
• Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
• Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
• Keynes after Ramsey: In defence of a treatise on probability
• Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping
• Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations
• A Definition of Subjective Probability
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Credence for conclusions: a brief for Jeffrey's rule