On the generalized squeezing functions and Fridman invariants of special domains
The purpose of this article is to study the generalized squeezing function and the Fridman invariant for special domains and provide explicit computations for annuli. The study of bounded domains in \(\mathbb{C}^n\) (or complex manifolds) and their biholomorphic invariants is a central topic in complex analysis. The squeezing function, introduced by \textit{F. Deng} et al. [Pac. J. Math. 257, No. 2, 319--341 (2012; Zbl 1254.32015)], is a biholomorphic invariant, which measures how well a domain in \(\mathbb{C}^n\) can be approximated by the unit ball. The generalized squeezing functions asks for approximation by other domains. It holds that if the squeezing function admits the value \(1\) at some point, then the domain is biholomorphically equivalent to the unit ball. In the article under review bounded domains, which are balanced, convex and homogeneous are considered. Considering the complement of compact subsets of these domains, it is shown that the squeezing function can be expressed in terms of the Carathéodory pseudodistance. Yet another biholomorphic invariant is the Fridman invariant introduced by \textit{B. L. Fridman} [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 276, 685--698 (1983; Zbl 0525.32022)], which in some sense is dual to the squeezing function. Similarly, if the Fridman invariant vanishes at some point of the domain, the domain is biholomorphic to the unit ball. In order to compare these two invariants a modification is required and it holds that the modified Fridman invariant dominates the squeezing function (see [\textit{N. Nikolov} and \textit{K. Verma}, J. Geom. Anal. 30, No. 2, 1218--1225 (2020; Zbl 1436.32048)]). On certain domains these two invariants agree. E.g. equality holds on domains, where a proper analytic subset or a domain with pseudoconvex boundary is removed. Based on these results, for annuli the squeezing function (which agrees with the modified Fridman invariant in this case) is explicitly computed. There are also formulas for the generalized squeezing function for certain domains, such as the polydisc, the unit ball and complements of these domains. In the last section examples of domains are provided, where the generalized squeezing function and the Fridman invariant are not plurisubharmonic.
- On the squeezing function and Fridman invariants
- On the comparison of the Fridman invariant and the squeezing function
- A domain with non-plurisubharmonic squeezing function
- A note on the squeezing function
- Some properties of squeezing functions on bounded domains
- A comparison of two biholomorphic invariants
- A new family of holomorphic homogeneous regular domains and some questions on the squeezing function
- Holomorphic invariants of bounded domains
- On the squeezing function for finitely connected planar domains
- Geometry of domains with the uniform squeezing property
- A comparison of two biholomorphic invariants
- A domain with non-plurisubharmonic squeezing function
- A gap theorem for the complex geometry of convex domains
- Biholomorphic Invariants of a Hyperbolic Manifold and some Applications
- Characterizing strong pseudoconvexity, obstructions to biholomorphisms, and Lyapunov exponents
- Eigentliche holomorphe Abbildungen
- Estimate of the squeezing function for a class of bounded domains
- Estimates for the squeezing function near strictly pseudoconvex boundary points with applications
- Extremal Holomorphic Imbeddings Between the Ball and Polydisc
- Fridman's invariant, squeezing functions, and exhausting domains
- Holomorphic invariants of bounded domains
- Holomorphic retracts and intrinsic metrics in convex domains
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3695610 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 54272 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3613366 (Why is no real title available?)
- Intrinsic derivative, curvature estimates and squeezing function
- Invariant distances and metrics in complex analysis
- On boundary points at which the squeezing function tends to one
- On Fridman invariants and generalized squeezing functions
- On the comparison of the Fridman invariant and the squeezing function
- On the squeezing function and Fridman invariants
- On the uniform squeezing property of bounded convex domains in \(\mathbb{C}^n\)
- Some properties of squeezing functions on bounded domains
- Squeezing functions and Cantor sets
- The Kobayashi Indicatrix at the Center of a Circular Domain
- The squeezing function on doubly-connected domains via the Loewner differential equation
- Holomorphic invariants of bounded domains
- On the squeezing function and Fridman invariants
- Fridman function, injectivity radius function, and squeezing function
- On Fridman invariants and generalized squeezing functions
- Fridman's invariant, squeezing functions, and exhausting domains
- A comparison of two biholomorphic invariants
- On the comparison of the Fridman invariant and the squeezing function
- d-balanced squeezing function
- The squeezing function: exact computations, optimal estimates, and a new application
- A DOMAIN WITH NONPLURISUBHARMONIC d-BALANCED SQUEEZING FUNCTION
- On the generalized squeezing functions and Fridman invariants of special domains
- On some properties of generalized squeezing functions and Fridman invariants
- A generalization of squeezing function
- Squeezing function on infinitely connected planar domain
- A note on the squeezing function and its generalizations
- On the generalised squeezing function
This page was built for publication: On the generalized squeezing functions and Fridman invariants of special domains
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2159750)
