Equiparadoxicality of Yablo's paradox and the liar
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2255207
DOI10.1007/S10849-012-9166-0zbMATH Open1305.03009OpenAlexW2082669089MaRDI QIDQ2255207FDOQ2255207
Authors: Ming Hsiung 
Publication date: 9 February 2015
Published in: Journal of Logic, Language and Information (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-012-9166-0
Recommendations
Cites Work
- What truth depends on
- Yablo's paradox
- Paradox without Self-Reference
- Yablo's paradox and \(\omega\)-inconsistency
- Truth and reflection
- Is Yablo's paradox non-circular?
- Patterns of paradox
- The elimination of self-reference: Generalized Yablo-series and the theory of truth
- Paradox without satisfaction
- Jump liars and Jourdain's card via the relativized T-scheme
- How to eliminate self-reference: a précis
- Revision Forever!
Cited In (18)
- The elimination of self-reference: Generalized Yablo-series and the theory of truth
- How to eliminate self-reference: a précis
- Boolean paradoxes and revision periods
- The elimination of direct self-reference
- Yablo without Gödel
- Guest editors' introduction
- Paradox without satisfaction
- What paradoxes depend on
- An entirely non-self-referential Yabloesque paradox
- Tarski's theorem and liar-like paradoxes
- Content Implication and the Yablo’s Sequent of Sentences
- Yablo's paradox as a theorem of modal logic
- Liar-type paradoxes and the incompleteness phenomena
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The Yablo paradox. An essay on circularity
- A graph-theoretic analysis of the semantic paradoxes
- Patterns of paradox
- Dangerous reference graphs and semantic paradoxes
This page was built for publication: Equiparadoxicality of Yablo's paradox and the liar
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2255207)
