Accounting for model errors in iterative ensemble smoothers

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2321967

DOI10.1007/S10596-019-9819-ZzbMATH Open1421.86011arXiv1806.00237OpenAlexW2962814906WikidataQ127968963 ScholiaQ127968963MaRDI QIDQ2321967FDOQ2321967

Geir Evensen

Publication date: 27 August 2019

Published in: Computational Geosciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In the strong-constraint formulation of the history-matching problem, we assume that all the model errors relate to a selection of uncertain model input parameters. One does not account for additional model errors that could result from, e.g., excluded uncertain parameters, neglected physics in the model formulation, the use of an approximate model forcing, or discretization errors resulting from numerical approximations. If parameters with significant uncertainties are unaccounted for, there is a risk for an unphysical update, of some uncertain parameters, that compensates for errors in the omitted parameters. This paper gives the theoretical foundation for introducing model errors in ensemble methods for history matching. In particular, we explain procedures for practically including model errors in iterative ensemble smoothers like ESMDA and IES. Also, we demonstrate the impact of adding (or neglecting) model errors in the parameter-estimation problem.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.00237





Cites Work


Cited In (3)

Uses Software






This page was built for publication: Accounting for model errors in iterative ensemble smoothers

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2321967)