Disappearing dissociations in experimental psychology: using state-trace analysis to test for multiple processes
DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2018.11.003zbMATH Open1431.62561OpenAlexW2906788692WikidataQ128667466 ScholiaQ128667466MaRDI QIDQ2332822FDOQ2332822
Authors: Rachel G. Stephens, Dora Matzke, Brett K. Hayes 
Publication date: 5 November 2019
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/disappearing-dissociations-in-experimental-psychology-using-statetrace-analysis-to-test-for-multiple-processes(41808978-5c18-4fbb-ac37-95bad5723ac5).html
Recommendations
- State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019)
- State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do
- State-trace analysis misinterpreted and misapplied: reply to Stephens, Matzke, and Hayes (2019)
- A hierarchical Bayesian state trace analysis for assessing monotonicity while factoring out subject, item, and trial level dependencies
- Bayes factors for state-trace analysis
Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15) Measurement and performance in psychology (91E45)
Cites Work
Cited In (5)
- Length of the state trace: a method for partitioning model complexity
- Comparison of type I error and statistical power between state trace analysis and analysis of variance
- State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do
- State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019)
- State-trace analysis misinterpreted and misapplied: reply to Stephens, Matzke, and Hayes (2019)
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Disappearing dissociations in experimental psychology: using state-trace analysis to test for multiple processes
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2332822)
