State-trace analysis misinterpreted and misapplied: reply to Stephens, Matzke, and Hayes (2019)

DOI10.1016/j.jmp.2019.07.001zbMath1431.62522OpenAlexW2961416392WikidataQ127467034 ScholiaQ127467034MaRDI QIDQ2332852

F. Gregory Ashby

Publication date: 5 November 2019

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2019.07.001

zbMATH Keywords

state-trace analysiscategorizationCOVIS

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Measurement and performance in psychology (91E45) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Related Items (4)

State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do ⋮ Comparison of type I error and statistical power between state trace analysis and analysis of variance ⋮ State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019) ⋮ Length of the state trace: a method for partitioning model complexity

Cites Work

• Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization
• Disappearing dissociations in experimental psychology: using state-trace analysis to test for multiple processes

This page was built for publication: State-trace analysis misinterpreted and misapplied: reply to Stephens, Matzke, and Hayes (2019)