State-trace analysis misinterpreted and misapplied: reply to Stephens, Matzke, and Hayes (2019)
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2332852
Recommendations
- State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019)
- State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do
- Length of the state trace: a method for partitioning model complexity
- A hierarchical Bayesian state trace analysis for assessing monotonicity while factoring out subject, item, and trial level dependencies
- Safeguarding against bad luck when attempting to discredit a state-trace model
Cites work
Cited in
(8)- State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do
- State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019)
- Special issue on state-trace analysis
- Disappearing dissociations in experimental psychology: using state-trace analysis to test for multiple processes
- Safeguarding against bad luck when attempting to discredit a state-trace model
- A hierarchical Bayesian state trace analysis for assessing monotonicity while factoring out subject, item, and trial level dependencies
- Comparison of type I error and statistical power between state trace analysis and analysis of variance
- Length of the state trace: a method for partitioning model complexity
This page was built for publication: State-trace analysis misinterpreted and misapplied: reply to Stephens, Matzke, and Hayes (2019)
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2332852)