State-trace analysis misinterpreted and misapplied: reply to Stephens, Matzke, and Hayes (2019)

DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2019.07.001zbMATH Open1431.62522OpenAlexW2961416392WikidataQ127467034 ScholiaQ127467034MaRDI QIDQ2332852FDOQ2332852

F. Gregory Ashby

Publication date: 5 November 2019

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2019.07.001

Recommendations

• State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019)
• State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do
• Length of the state trace: a method for partitioning model complexity
• A hierarchical Bayesian state trace analysis for assessing monotonicity while factoring out subject, item, and trial level dependencies
• Safeguarding against bad luck when attempting to discredit a state-trace model

zbMATH Keywords

state-trace analysiscategorizationCOVIS

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15) Measurement and performance in psychology (91E45)

Cites Work

• Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization
• Disappearing dissociations in experimental psychology: using state-trace analysis to test for multiple processes

Cited In (4)

• Length of the state trace: a method for partitioning model complexity
• Comparison of type I error and statistical power between state trace analysis and analysis of variance
• State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do
• State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019)

This page was built for publication: State-trace analysis misinterpreted and misapplied: reply to Stephens, Matzke, and Hayes (2019)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2332852)