Comparison of type I error and statistical power between state trace analysis and analysis of variance

DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2023.102767MaRDI QIDQ6134081zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Wei Liu, Yu-Xue Jia

Publication date 25 July 2023

Published in Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2023.102767

zbMATH Keywords

type I errorstatistical poweranalysis of variancestate-trace analysisconjoint monotonic regression

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Recommendations

• State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do
• A hierarchical Bayesian state trace analysis for assessing monotonicity while factoring out subject, item, and trial level dependencies
• State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019)
• Mean comparison: manifest variable versus latent variable
• Special issue on state-trace analysis

Cites work

• A statistical test of the equality of latent orders
• Disappearing dissociations in experimental psychology: using state-trace analysis to test for multiple processes
• Safeguarding against bad luck when attempting to discredit a state-trace model
• State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do
• State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019)
• State-trace analysis misinterpreted and misapplied: reply to Stephens, Matzke, and Hayes (2019)

Cited in

(1)

• Comparison of Statistical Methods for Pretest–Posttest Designs in Terms of Type I Error Probability and Statistical Power

This page was built for publication: Comparison of type I error and statistical power between state trace analysis and analysis of variance

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6134081)