Comparison of type I error and statistical power between state trace analysis and analysis of variance

DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2023.102767OpenAlexW4360821273MaRDI QIDQ6134081FDOQ6134081

Authors: Wei Liu, Yu-Xue Jia 

Publication date: 25 July 2023

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2023.102767

Recommendations

• State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do
• A hierarchical Bayesian state trace analysis for assessing monotonicity while factoring out subject, item, and trial level dependencies
• State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019)
• Mean comparison: manifest variable versus latent variable
• Special issue on state-trace analysis

zbMATH Keywords

type I errorstatistical poweranalysis of variancestate-trace analysisconjoint monotonic regression

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Cites Work

• A statistical test of the equality of latent orders
• State trace analysis: what it can and cannot do
• State-trace analysis -- misrepresented and misunderstood: reply to Ashby (2019)
• Disappearing dissociations in experimental psychology: using state-trace analysis to test for multiple processes
• Safeguarding against bad luck when attempting to discredit a state-trace model
• State-trace analysis misinterpreted and misapplied: reply to Stephens, Matzke, and Hayes (2019)

Cited In (1)

• Comparison of Statistical Methods for Pretest–Posttest Designs in Terms of Type I Error Probability and Statistical Power

This page was built for publication: Comparison of type I error and statistical power between state trace analysis and analysis of variance

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6134081)