On hybrid models of quantum finite automata
Unitary operators perform the state evolution of quantum finite automata (QFA). Hybrid quantum finite automatons differ from quantum finite automata. They are composed of two interactive components, a quantum component and a classical one. An input symbol is scanned; the quantum and classical components interact to evolve into new states during which communication may occur between them. There are three main classes of quantum hybrid finite automata that differ in the way they communicate which each other. In class one only quantum-classical communication is allowed, the quantum component sends its measurement result to the classical component. In class two only classical-quantum communications is allowed, the classical component sends its current state to the quantum component. In class three both classical-quantum and quantum-classical communication are allowed. First, the classical component sends its current state to the quantum component and then the quantum component sends its measurement result to the classical component. In the paper it is shown that non-hybrid quantum finite automata that perform a unitary state evolution can simulate all the three classes. It seems that hybrid quantum finite automata are equivalent to quantum finite automata. From the authors' abstract: ``As corollaries, some results in the literature concerning the language recognition power and the equivalence problem of hybrid QFA follow directly from these relationships clarified in this paper.
- Analysis of finite 1-qubit quantum automata unitary operators of which are rotations
- On finite automata with quantum and classical states
- Two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states.
- One-way finite automata with quantum and classical states
- Lower bounds on the size of semi-quantum finite automata
- A note on quantum sequential machines
- A Polynomial-Time Algorithm for the Equivalence of Probabilistic Automata
- An application of quantum finite automata to interactive proof systems
- Characterization of sequential quantum machines
- Characterizations of 1-Way Quantum Finite Automata
- Characterizations of one-way general quantum finite automata
- Dense quantum coding and quantum finite automata
- Determination of equivalence between quantum sequential machines
- Determining the equivalence for one-way quantum finite automata
- Exponentially more concise quantum recognition of non-RMM regular languages
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1579275 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2040892 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3371972 (Why is no real title available?)
- Multi-letter quantum finite automata: decidability of the equivalence and minimization of states
- On the complexity of minimizing probabilistic and quantum automata
- On the complexity of simulating space-bounded quantum computations
- On the state complexity of semi-quantum finite automata
- One-way finite automata with quantum and classical states
- Quantum automata and quantum grammars
- Quantum finite automata with control language
- Regular languages accepted by quantum automata
- Towards a quantum programming language
- Two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states.
- Unbounded-error quantum computation with small space bounds
- Undecidability on quantum finite automata
- Various Aspects of Finite Quantum Automata
- Finite automata capturing winning sequences for all possible variants of the \(PQ\) penny flip game
- Lower bounds on the size of semi-quantum finite automata
- Models in quantum computing: a systematic review
- Analysis of finite 1-qubit quantum automata unitary operators of which are rotations
- Generalizations of the distributed Deutsch-Jozsa promise problem
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1948489 (Why is no real title available?)
- Quantum Markov chains: description of hybrid systems, decidability of equivalence, and model checking linear-time properties
- Time-Space Complexity Advantages for Quantum Computing
- Application of distributed semi-quantum computing model in phase estimation
- Promise problems solved by quantum and classical finite automata
- Quantum finite automata and weighted automata
- Lifting query complexity to time-space complexity for two-way finite automata
This page was built for publication: On hybrid models of quantum finite automata
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2353395)