Dolbeault-Dirac operators, quantum Clifford algebras and the Parthasarathy formula

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2361406



Abstract: We consider Dolbeault-Dirac operators on quantized irreducible flag manifolds as defined by Kr"ahmer and Tucker-Simmons. We show that, in general, these operators do not satisfy a formula of Parthasarathy-type. This is a consequence of two results that we prove here: we always have quadratic commutation relations for the relevant quantum root vectors, up to terms in the quantized Levi factor; there are examples of quantum Clifford algebras where the commutation relations are not of quadratic-constant type.


It is known that Dolbeault-Dirac operators on Kähler manifolds can be expressed as \(D = \eth + \eth^* \in U(\mathfrak{g}) \otimes Cl\), where \(U(\mathfrak{g})\) is the enveloping algebra of \(\mathfrak{g}\) and \(Cl\) is an appropriate Clifford algebra. For a Dolbeault-Dirac operator \(D\), Parthasarathy formula gives an expression for \(D^2\) in terms of quadratic Casimirs, up to multiples of the identity. Krähmer and Tucker-Simmons found that Dolbeault-Dirac operators on quantized irreducible flag manifolds can be expressed in the form of \(D = \eth +\eth^* \in U_q(\mathfrak{g})\otimes Cl_q\), where \(U_q(\mathfrak{g})\) is the quantized enveloping algebra of \(\mathfrak{g}\) and \(Cl_q\) is the quantum Clifford algebra. In this paper, the author proves that, unlike the classical case, a Parthasarathy-type formula does not hold for quantized irreducible flag manifolds, For example, the Lagrangian Grassmannian LG(2, 4) is considered.











This page was built for publication: Dolbeault-Dirac operators, quantum Clifford algebras and the Parthasarathy formula

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2361406)