Ranking opportunity sets on the basis of their freedom of choice and their ability to satisfy preferences: a difficulty
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2386280
DOI10.1007/S003550050112zbMATH Open1066.91506OpenAlexW2081906316MaRDI QIDQ2386280FDOQ2386280
Authors: Nicolas Gravel
Publication date: 22 August 2005
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050112
Recommendations
Cited In (14)
- Evaluating opportunities when more is less
- Consequences, opportunities, and Arrovian impossibility theorems with consequentialist domains
- Freedom of choice and diversity of options: some difficulties
- Opportunity sets and individual well-being
- On ranking compact and comprehensive opportunity sets.
- Freedom of choice in a social context: comparing game forms
- Incomplete preferences and the preference for flexibility
- Arrovian impossibilities in aggregating preferences over non-resolute outcomes
- Extended preferences and freedom of choice
- Cardinality-based equality of opportunities
- A variant of non-consequentialism and its characterization
- Characterizations of consequentialism and nonconsequentialism
- Consequences, opportunities, and generalized consequentialism and non-consequentialism.
- More on preference and freedom
This page was built for publication: Ranking opportunity sets on the basis of their freedom of choice and their ability to satisfy preferences: a difficulty
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2386280)